Shipping notes, product decisions, and technical experiments from real-world builds.
A weekend experiment porting my site-editor architecture to marketing emails — drag-and-drop blocks, an AI design assistant, react.email under the hood. Shared Zod schemas let the canvas and the planner stay in lockstep.
Puck is the open-source visual drag-and-drop page builder for React — 12k+ GitHub stars, a clean plugin API, and the one the community has rallied around. Avocado Studio plugs into it natively: visual editing on the canvas, AI chat in the sidebar, both producing the same operations through the same orchestrator. No extra integration work for the site.
The enterprise DXPs are racing to ship agentic editing. I'm building an open, self-hostable alternative — here's what I've learned so far.
Planning a family trip to Puglia, I hit a wall with Google Maps. So I built a pipeline that searches, deduplicates, and maps places automatically.
A personal R&D experiment: what happens when you point Claude Code and Codex at the question 'what if you could just tell a website what to change?' and let them build for a few months.
What changed when I moved Gemini Nano from demo mode into real user workflows.
What actually works when you want AI output to feel live inside a visual editor.
Strict JSON output looks clean on paper. The moment you try to parse it token-by-token, you find out how many ways an LLM can hand you a half-finished object.
Chat feels magical early, but property panels keep teams precise once complexity grows.